Wednesday, June 29, 2011

jennifer aniston 90s

images 90s Jennifer Aniston: Schwing jennifer aniston 90s. 2010 Jennifer Aniston can
  • 2010 Jennifer Aniston can



  • uma001
    07-29 05:10 AM
    Add Wachovia now acquired by Wells Fargo to the list. They don't even do H1 extensions.

    That's too bad.





    wallpaper 2010 Jennifer Aniston can jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston is nearing a
  • Jennifer Aniston is nearing a



  • komaragiri
    08-29 05:52 PM
    This is totally wate of time. Please delete this thread.


    Let's not discuss on who is best and who is worst. Focus on the future action items for IV. Discuss more about those items, so that we all can get out of this mess and live happily.





    jennifer aniston 90s. Well, Jennifer Aniston is one
  • Well, Jennifer Aniston is one



  • geniousatwork
    06-11 08:50 AM
    done....me and my wife did it





    2011 Jennifer Aniston is nearing a jennifer aniston 90s. If Jennifer Aniston#39;s
  • If Jennifer Aniston#39;s



  • spicy_guy
    08-11 11:44 AM
    I may be wrong on my thinking, but I do hope you take a suggestion - when reading the INS law, understand it independently first. Then go back to see, if it can be applied on your interpretation. Do not start out with it, everything looks red when wearing red tinted glasses.......

    After the advocacy days in DC, I am sold on what IV is offering and its commitment to the EB community. I am EB3 too and I am pretty much in the same boat as many of you here.

    You put it out well from your side.
    BTW, are you really 2007 EB3 I? Do you have a guesstimate on when you would get GC?:rolleyes:



    more...


    jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston 90.
  • Jennifer Aniston 90.



  • sertasheep
    07-04 01:24 AM
    Hello Veeru,

    Your questions not frivolous. We will keep members updated on our course of action.

    More than anything else, we require our members to stand by us, and create awareness in the community.

    Thank you for your patience, and faith in us.

    On behalf of Core IV team


    I have great respect for some of the core members i know. They have done lot of work to make this forum successful. But i always think that you can increase participation if you make things more clear and take comments in a positive way.

    I am sure many guest members or other frequent visitors to IV website get the impression that there is always a fund drive for something or the other on the IV Website homepage and there is always a target amount which never seems to be met.

    I understand that there are expenses to maintain the website etc, but here we are talking about fund drive for lawsuit. Sometimes I wonder what will happen if you can not collect $5000 so will you wait to file a lawsuit until you collect $5000? May it will be too late then. What if you collect only say $4000? How do you decide these arbitrary numbers?

    Are you planning for a separate litigation from that of AILF? How will you complement the effort by AILF with money?

    Hey, who am I to ask these questions! These are some of the questions on behalf of hundreds of members who need to know more to actively participate to make it a success. There is no reason you should take it in a negative way.

    Veeru

    I will sleep less stupid tonight!!





    jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston rocks #39;the
  • Jennifer Aniston rocks #39;the



  • logiclife
    04-23 04:22 PM
    -------------
    Northern California members we need volunteers for an event on Wednesday (04/25) in Campbell @ 1:00 p.m. for an hour. This is much more interactive event. No undocumented immigration issues just EB related issues. Please join the yahoo group and get involved. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NC_Immigration_Voice/

    Lets keep the momentum going.

    You may want to start a new thread with an appropriate title, to get more attention from members in Northern CA.



    more...


    jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston
  • Jennifer Aniston



  • ajthakur
    07-14 06:47 PM
    Suppose my employer had revoked the 140 application within 180 days. In that case should I receive a NOID instead of RFE now.
    The reason there is an RFE and not a NOID means USCIS is trying to adjudicate your application. Depends what action they take on your response..my 2 cents





    2010 Well, Jennifer Aniston is one jennifer aniston 90s. 90s Jennifer Aniston: Schwing
  • 90s Jennifer Aniston: Schwing



  • coopheal
    11-12 09:58 AM
    IV core should have two focus: long term plan and a short term plan.

    Long term plan is anything that involves visa increase.

    Short term plan is anything that does not involve visa increase, but that provides some kind of releif to us. A no-nonsense, non-controversial and simple measure that can be added to an appropriation bill is a best example.

    I hope the core is reading this post...

    If you have an idea, and possibly a suggestion on how to implement it, post it. Even an old idea with innovative implementation may help us.

    However, please do not wait on contribution thinking until something happens I don�t have to contribute. IV core is already working on many issues, and your monthly contribution would help stabilize resource needs for current items.



    more...


    jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston 2010 received
  • Jennifer Aniston 2010 received



  • deepimpact
    09-10 08:50 PM
    It is a given that Demand is not stagnant . If it were , backlog would have been reduced by 140K this year alone.


    Each year the new quota is 140K , as long as the new demand each year ~100K - the remaining 40K goes towards backlog elimination . We will know in the next inventory report what is "net" reduction for 2010. One can do rough math of latest inventory report and the current priority dates to arrive at ~approximate figure of 35-40K.

    I think EB3 should get cleared in next 5 years - I think flood of new EB2 applications are overblown.

    I think "peak demand" was between 2003 and 2007 . Good news is USCIS is no more wasting numbers .

    Given that change to laws is almost impossible. We should sit tight and wait for 3-5 years.

    The problem with your analysis is not every one in the backlog has equal access to excess of 35-40K visas available each year. Most of the excess comes from EB4,5,1 and 2ROW and all goes to EB2 I/C. EB3 ROW gets ~30K every year (42K- 4*2.8K).
    Even if we are to assume that post 2007 the demand for EB2 I/C and EB3 is low then also it is ~ 15K for EB2 I/C and ~ 10K for EB3 ROW. But the way INA law is framed EB3 I (most backlogged with ~ 60K) will only get 2800 visa till either of EB2 I/C or EB3 row becomes current. And by current I mean real current, not July 2007. Using these numbers it will still take 4-5 for both EB2 I/C and EB3 Row to become current.
    This is assuming low demand in all EB categories continue.
    It will be only after 2014-15 that EB3I will get ~ 50K SOFAD(35K SOFAD which EB2 I/C was getting plus about 15K from EB3 ROW category). So in 2015 EB3 I will see a jump of ~ 4 yrs (2003-2007). So EB3I folks with PD after 2007 will have a relative wait time of ~ 8 yrs but folks from 2003-4 are looking at a 12-13 year wait unless reform like Recapture/STEM Degree holders & Dependents excluded from cap is passed.





    hair If Jennifer Aniston#39;s jennifer aniston 90s. Name: Jennifer Aniston
  • Name: Jennifer Aniston



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-10 09:11 AM
    Hi, Did you send the AC21 letter yourself? Can you please let us know the format of the letter and supporting documents you sent? Also, please share the format of G-28 explanation. How was your experience so far? Did you receive any confirmation back from USCIS? Thanks.

    meimmi, we are still working on it.
    might end up hiring a lawyer only for filling AC-21. I know its not a big deal, but still trying to be on the cautious side.

    We also had the same questions as u had and were not able to find anything.
    If you find anything please share it with us also. We are going to file this week for sure.



    more...


    jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Lopez, in the 90s was
  • Jennifer Lopez, in the 90s was



  • sbabunle
    12-28 10:07 PM
    Anybody tried timesof India?





    hot Jennifer Aniston 90. jennifer aniston 90s. 21 year old Jennifer Aniston.
  • 21 year old Jennifer Aniston.



  • nixstor
    10-26 10:17 PM
    please send the link and doc.

    Please look at the first post in the thread.



    more...


    house pictures Jennifer Aniston was jennifer aniston 90s. else—Jennifer Aniston#39;s
  • else—Jennifer Aniston#39;s



  • stldude
    07-11 02:23 PM
    PD is May 2003, I-140 allready approved
    485 sent on July 02 ( missed the boat by a day).





    tattoo Jennifer Aniston rocks #39;the jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston hated quot;The
  • Jennifer Aniston hated quot;The



  • cool_desi_gc
    03-17 04:15 PM
    This clearly shows that EB3 India pipe is clogged becuase of lot of pending cases in 2001/02.Many of them are 245i cases as well.Once the PD crosses 2002, EB3 should go a little smoother.

    BTW, mine is Dec 2002



    more...


    pictures Jennifer Aniston jennifer aniston 90s. Thankfully, Aniston had no
  • Thankfully, Aniston had no



  • delax
    07-13 10:34 AM
    Why didnt the EB2 ROW number trickle to ROW EB3 first?

    Think about this for a minute. By doing so EB3-ROW is given precedence over EB2-Retro country after the ROW within EB2 has been satisfied. I cant see how that can make sense - not that anything in the GC sojourn makes sense. The categorization across employment categories is due to a difference in skill, training and experience level. Once the ROW demand within a category has been satisified, the retro country within the same category needs to get a preference over any lower category - sounds very harsh and heirarchical but thats how it is.





    dresses 21 year old Jennifer Aniston. jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston was apart of
  • Jennifer Aniston was apart of



  • optimystic
    03-18 08:35 PM
    Urgh.. Here come the red squares...Why do I even bother posting comments!



    more...


    makeup Jennifer Aniston 2010 received jennifer aniston 90s. pictures Jennifer Aniston was
  • pictures Jennifer Aniston was



  • akp22
    07-13 06:13 PM
    Yes, they can do a lot more than 25 k in 2 months.
    EB2 folks, please get prepared for RFEs - a few possibilities.
    1. Medicals, outdated physicals, PPD positive etc.
    2. Passport expired since applying for I-485 last summer.
    3. Father's or Mother's name misspelled.
    4. DOB discrepancies.
    5. Translations of documents
    6. Find those old pay-stubs, bank records, W2s, I-20s
    7. Google yourself and your spouse.

    Yes, I got RFE on birth cert....





    girlfriend Jennifer Aniston hated quot;The jennifer aniston 90s. friends Jennifer Aniston
  • friends Jennifer Aniston



  • onemorecame
    09-14 01:22 PM
    I am current on this month of sep, Online status change to RFE on Sep 10. 2010
    I feel its could be due to change of state(relocation) after filling i-485. but not sure..


    Please share your RFE/view





    hairstyles Jennifer Lopez, in the 90s was jennifer aniston 90s. Jennifer Aniston
  • Jennifer Aniston



  • perm2gc
    01-18 03:39 PM
    http://groups.google.com/group/usaimmigration/browse_thread/thread/7be520c4b9c1cab5?hl=en

    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.visa.us/topics?lnk=gschg&hl=en&

    http://groups.google.com/group/misc.immigration.usa/topics?lnk=gschg&hl=en&





    rimzhim
    04-04 03:43 PM
    if this bill is signed into law...most desi consultant companies with one h4 aunty doing the accounting work + recruiting + administrative work will have to shut down
    :D





    pointlesswait
    02-04 10:31 AM
    some jack left me a message calling me ignorant.

    ppl here are discussing his topic to death.. abt changing the per country quota.
    No one here wants to even ponder that.. immigration into US is a not a random act.

    The policy makers and thinkers may have spent many sleepless nights to arrive at the thought of giving every global citizen an equal opportunity to migrate to this "land of opportunity".

    So even an attempt to remove per country quota is absurd and retarded thought.

    Be practical and make more realistic suggestions..

    a.) IF someone has been inthis country for 10 years ..F1->H1, he shoudl qualify for EAD (no constrains) , until the visa number become avaliable.

    b.) Allow for simultaneous 140-485 filing..


    so if peeps here think that i am ignorant for saying that attempt to remove country quota is a non-starter.. think again.. DF's



    No comments:

    Post a Comment