solaris27
08-11 06:13 PM
anyone
wallpaper dresses The Emo boys hair cut pictures emo boys hairstyles.
gconmymind
08-23 01:18 PM
Should I be a little hopeful that my case is being pre-adjudicated?
frostrated
06-02 01:22 PM
Hi,
In case dependent is in India and priority date is current. Will this impact on getting EAD for dependent and primary applicant.
Thanks,
yes. you cannot file AoS while out of country. you can file for yourself, but will have to file for the dependent/s when they return.
In case dependent is in India and priority date is current. Will this impact on getting EAD for dependent and primary applicant.
Thanks,
yes. you cannot file AoS while out of country. you can file for yourself, but will have to file for the dependent/s when they return.
2011 emo boys hairstyles.
aray
09-26 02:46 PM
I think I know the answer to this, but I just wanted to make sure from the experts on this forum.
Do we need to apply for new EAD/AP if we change jobs using AC21 even if the current EAD/AP (approved when working for the GC sponsoring employer) are valid for almost 10 more months?
I think that EAD/AP are not dependent/tied to the employer.
Am I right gurus?
Do we need to apply for new EAD/AP if we change jobs using AC21 even if the current EAD/AP (approved when working for the GC sponsoring employer) are valid for almost 10 more months?
I think that EAD/AP are not dependent/tied to the employer.
Am I right gurus?
more...
ssksubash
05-04 08:38 AM
Hi,
Do we have to pay the issuance fee if we are getting stamping in India. I am getting my H1B stamping in chennai. I am in my 8th yr of H1B.
Can any one please inform me about this ? Also if any one recently had their stamping done, can you please post your experience.
Thanks,
Do we have to pay the issuance fee if we are getting stamping in India. I am getting my H1B stamping in chennai. I am in my 8th yr of H1B.
Can any one please inform me about this ? Also if any one recently had their stamping done, can you please post your experience.
Thanks,
afterhourz
05-18 05:33 PM
i just got swift 3d not to long ago and im having some troubles. i want to know how can you group objects?
in other words
let's say i have 4 cubes in my scene. how will i be able to move them all in a synchronized way?
in other words
let's say i have 4 cubes in my scene. how will i be able to move them all in a synchronized way?
more...
Blog Feeds
09-18 06:10 PM
The Thai Community Development Center (Thai CDC) was founded in 1994 by leading human rights activist, Chanchanit Martorell, on the idea that all peoples have a basic right to a decent standard of living and quality of life. Yet, in the Thai and other disadvantaged communities, people are living in substandard housing and lack access to basic health services, education and quality employment. As a social change organization engaged in human rights advocacy and broad based community development, the Thai CDC seeks to empower the most vulnerable and economically disadvantaged members of the Thai community. They include poor recent immigrants,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/09/thai-cdc-combats-human-trafficking-and-modern-day-slavery.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/09/thai-cdc-combats-human-trafficking-and-modern-day-slavery.html)
2010 Emo Boys Hairstyles 2010
fu3142
06-28 12:00 PM
Hello everybody,
I am a new member. I read some of the posts on this website and know that there are some Singaporeans in this thread who have applied for the H1B1 visa under the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Questions:
1. How long does the process of applying for the USSFTA H1-B1 take?
2. Where is the best place to apply for the USSFTA H1-B1 visa?
Please advise especially if you have already done it. I am about to start the process. Any advice is highly appreciated.
Cheers!!
I am a new member. I read some of the posts on this website and know that there are some Singaporeans in this thread who have applied for the H1B1 visa under the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. Questions:
1. How long does the process of applying for the USSFTA H1-B1 take?
2. Where is the best place to apply for the USSFTA H1-B1 visa?
Please advise especially if you have already done it. I am about to start the process. Any advice is highly appreciated.
Cheers!!
more...
LOL123
10-21 02:41 PM
I am a dependent to the primary applicant of 485. i am planning to change my status from H1 to EAD. what is the procedure. Do I need to inform any one?
hair hairstyles Cool Emo Boys
peacocklover
09-08 01:30 PM
Labor application was filed in 2008 and got approved in 2009; what is my PD 2008 or 2009?
it's date when your PERM application was filed.
Priority date - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_date)
it's date when your PERM application was filed.
Priority date - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_date)
more...
n8900498
07-27 08:03 PM
I signed an employment agreement stating that if I had to leave my employer before getting my Green Card that I will be liable for all the fees pertaining to the Green Card application which my employer has been paying for while I am been employed by him.
I have heard that an employer cannot hold Green Card fees over an employee. I also believe if anything, the fees owing should drop according to the length of time that the employee has worked for that employer.
I have been with my current employer for 4 years now and I wish to leave him but I do not want to pay him for the Green Card fees as I believe that should be a business expense to him.
I would just like to know what are my rights in the above case
Best Regards
I have heard that an employer cannot hold Green Card fees over an employee. I also believe if anything, the fees owing should drop according to the length of time that the employee has worked for that employer.
I have been with my current employer for 4 years now and I wish to leave him but I do not want to pay him for the Green Card fees as I believe that should be a business expense to him.
I would just like to know what are my rights in the above case
Best Regards
hot Emo Boys Fashion 2011
Blog Feeds
09-02 10:10 PM
Pew confirms what we've already assumed is happening. The number of illegally present immigrants has dropped 8% since 2007. The number is now about 11 million, down from peaking at 12 million. The annual migration of illegally present immigrants has dropped from about 850,000 a year a few years ago to just 300,000 a year today. Why? Probably a combination of a lousy economy and much more vigorous enforcement, particularly at the border. Here is the report for your viewing pleasure: pew hispanic study 08-2010 -
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/pew-study-illegal-immigraton-down-sharply.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/pew-study-illegal-immigraton-down-sharply.html)
more...
house hot Emo Boys Hairstyles
Student with no hopes
10-20 11:18 AM
The dream of multiple-biometric IDs may become a reality in India (http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/352077/Multiple_Biometric_IDs_Dream_or_Reality_)
tattoo emo boys hairstyles.
akshayae
09-07 12:56 PM
Folks,
Members from the DC area will be meeting in the Great Falls (Virginina)public library meeting room from 1 pm to 3 pm on Saturday September 8th 2007. Members in DC/VA/MD areas are requested to meet other members to find out more info about the rally and importance of making this rally a success. The address for Great Falls Public Library is
Date and Time
Sep 8th 2007 Time from 1 pm to 3 pm
Meeting Room
9830 Georgetown Pike, Great Falls, VA 22066-2634
Ph 703-757-8560
We look forward to meeting you at Great Falls Public Library
Members from the DC area will be meeting in the Great Falls (Virginina)public library meeting room from 1 pm to 3 pm on Saturday September 8th 2007. Members in DC/VA/MD areas are requested to meet other members to find out more info about the rally and importance of making this rally a success. The address for Great Falls Public Library is
Date and Time
Sep 8th 2007 Time from 1 pm to 3 pm
Meeting Room
9830 Georgetown Pike, Great Falls, VA 22066-2634
Ph 703-757-8560
We look forward to meeting you at Great Falls Public Library
more...
pictures Emo boys also have
ski_dude12
07-27 03:45 PM
Tell your attorney to file a Writ of Mandamus. You can google it to get more details.
dresses 2010 Straight Emo Hairstyles
GCVictim
02-18 02:37 PM
Hi,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
more...
makeup Boys Scene Emo Hairstyle
savioz
02-02 10:55 AM
Currently I�m holding h1 and same time has AOS with my existing employer. I�m continuing my employment based on h1 and use Advance parole for travel purpose. My employer mentioned about not revoking I-140, even if I move to new employer. Since with new client, I�m transferring my H1 visa, I have 2 options with regard to my AOS portability
1) Either just transfers my h1 without porting AOS with new client. Continue with my AOS with old employer, since he won�t revoke my I-140 and provide support for future employment.
2) H1 transfer and Porting my AOS with new client and it does require my job and description mentioned in I-140 matches with current offer.
I would really appreciate, if you provide your valuable suggestion/recommendation. The best option to go ahead with.
1) Either just transfers my h1 without porting AOS with new client. Continue with my AOS with old employer, since he won�t revoke my I-140 and provide support for future employment.
2) H1 transfer and Porting my AOS with new client and it does require my job and description mentioned in I-140 matches with current offer.
I would really appreciate, if you provide your valuable suggestion/recommendation. The best option to go ahead with.
girlfriend Finally, many emo guys style
ashokmads
02-13 04:10 PM
Hi All,
My parents I94 is expiring on March 27th 2008.
We had filed for extension (form I 539) in California Service Centre with receipt date of Jan 02 2008.
Calif is currently processing Oct 2007 I529s.
My concerns are :
1) I think their stay here is legal till we hear back from USCIS on their extension. Please confirm if this is true.
2) If they get declined , they have to leave immediately. Is that period of stay considered illegal?
3) Is overstaying with legal extension an issue if they need to come again after 6 months or so? What is the criteria they look for for frequency of visits/stay periods at port of entry.
Will greatly appreciat all your personal experiences /wise opinion on this matter of pressing concern for us.
Thanks
Ash
My parents I94 is expiring on March 27th 2008.
We had filed for extension (form I 539) in California Service Centre with receipt date of Jan 02 2008.
Calif is currently processing Oct 2007 I529s.
My concerns are :
1) I think their stay here is legal till we hear back from USCIS on their extension. Please confirm if this is true.
2) If they get declined , they have to leave immediately. Is that period of stay considered illegal?
3) Is overstaying with legal extension an issue if they need to come again after 6 months or so? What is the criteria they look for for frequency of visits/stay periods at port of entry.
Will greatly appreciat all your personal experiences /wise opinion on this matter of pressing concern for us.
Thanks
Ash
hairstyles Emo Boys Hairstyle | Just
Macaca
09-27 05:46 PM
Bill Would Protect Frosh on Immigration (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_30/news/20086-1.html) By Jennifer Yachnin | ROLL CALL STAFF, September 20, 2007
House Democratic leaders are drafting a resolution designed to inoculate freshman lawmakers on the issue of immigration, despite concerns from within their own Caucus about reopening debate over the contentious topic.
According to several freshman Democratic lawmakers in attendance at a weekly breakfast meeting with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), Members were told to prepare statements on the resolution, which will endorse laws already on the books that prevent illegal immigrants from participating in taxpayer-funded programs, such as Social Security or food stamps.
In a draft of the resolution obtained by Roll Call, the measure expresses the sense of the House "with respect to the importance of upholding federal immigration laws and ensuring the integrity and security of the borders of the United States."
In addition to the language on public benefits, the draft resolution also contains provisions calling on the executive branch to enforce laws on voter fraud and border security.
But one House lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said some senior Members have objected to the proposal over concerns that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to limit the scope of the debate. The House largely abandoned plans to pursue a comprehensive immigration reform bill earlier this year after the Senate failed to cut off debate on its own version of the legislation, effectively killing the bill.
Majority Whip James Clyburn (S.C.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.) began work on the resolution earlier this month in response to repeated Republican efforts to force votes on immigration on the House floor through the use of procedural amendments.
"We're trying to figure out a way we can do this and maintain party unity on the motions ... without making it a crisis," said one Democratic lawmaker, who is a member of the Whip operation.
Although one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified since plans have not been finalized, said the measure could move to the floor as early as next week, a House leadership aide said it is unlikely to be that soon.
To date, Democratic leaders have not demanded that Members vote against all motions to recommit - a procedural tool that can be used by the minority party immediately before a vote on final passage of a bill - unless the amendment contains language that would shelve the legislation.
"I've resisted motions to recommit unless they're substantive and then I'll vote for them," explained Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.), a freshman lawmaker who has faced attacks from the National Republican Congressional Committee for votes against some GOP-authored amendments on immigration.
"It's frustrating to me," Walz added, criticizing the amendments as political footballs. "I'm appreciative that our leadership lets us vote accordingly."
But that policy led to some confusion on the House floor in early August during a vote on a GOP-authored amendment to the Agriculture spending bill to prohibit illegal immigrants from accessing certain federally funded programs, with nearly 20 Democrats initially voting in favor of the proposal.
Republicans allege that the Democratic majority mishandled that vote, resulting in the defeat of the measure. GOP leaders assert that a tied 214-214 vote - rending a defeat - announced by the Speaker Pro Tem was inaccurate and that the motion had in fact passed 215-213 as Republicans changed their votes.
But Democrats dispute that version of events, noting that their own Members were changing votes on the House floor, resulting in the final tally of 212-216.
The dispute prompted the establishment of a select committee to investigate the vote, which is scheduled to hold its first meeting this morning, and produce an interim report Sept. 30.
Republican Rep. Tom Price (Ga.), who has sponsored similar amendments addressing the use of federal funds to assist illegal immigrants, including a measure that failed Tuesday night on a federal housing bill, expressed interest in the Democratic proposal.
"I'd love to be able to talk with them about it and work on it," Price said. He could not say whether such a measure would deter him from offering such amendments in the future without seeing the details of the bill.
"When I talk to folks at home they want to know why we're not including this language on every single piece of legislation," he added.
House Democratic leaders are drafting a resolution designed to inoculate freshman lawmakers on the issue of immigration, despite concerns from within their own Caucus about reopening debate over the contentious topic.
According to several freshman Democratic lawmakers in attendance at a weekly breakfast meeting with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), Members were told to prepare statements on the resolution, which will endorse laws already on the books that prevent illegal immigrants from participating in taxpayer-funded programs, such as Social Security or food stamps.
In a draft of the resolution obtained by Roll Call, the measure expresses the sense of the House "with respect to the importance of upholding federal immigration laws and ensuring the integrity and security of the borders of the United States."
In addition to the language on public benefits, the draft resolution also contains provisions calling on the executive branch to enforce laws on voter fraud and border security.
But one House lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said some senior Members have objected to the proposal over concerns that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to limit the scope of the debate. The House largely abandoned plans to pursue a comprehensive immigration reform bill earlier this year after the Senate failed to cut off debate on its own version of the legislation, effectively killing the bill.
Majority Whip James Clyburn (S.C.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.) began work on the resolution earlier this month in response to repeated Republican efforts to force votes on immigration on the House floor through the use of procedural amendments.
"We're trying to figure out a way we can do this and maintain party unity on the motions ... without making it a crisis," said one Democratic lawmaker, who is a member of the Whip operation.
Although one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified since plans have not been finalized, said the measure could move to the floor as early as next week, a House leadership aide said it is unlikely to be that soon.
To date, Democratic leaders have not demanded that Members vote against all motions to recommit - a procedural tool that can be used by the minority party immediately before a vote on final passage of a bill - unless the amendment contains language that would shelve the legislation.
"I've resisted motions to recommit unless they're substantive and then I'll vote for them," explained Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.), a freshman lawmaker who has faced attacks from the National Republican Congressional Committee for votes against some GOP-authored amendments on immigration.
"It's frustrating to me," Walz added, criticizing the amendments as political footballs. "I'm appreciative that our leadership lets us vote accordingly."
But that policy led to some confusion on the House floor in early August during a vote on a GOP-authored amendment to the Agriculture spending bill to prohibit illegal immigrants from accessing certain federally funded programs, with nearly 20 Democrats initially voting in favor of the proposal.
Republicans allege that the Democratic majority mishandled that vote, resulting in the defeat of the measure. GOP leaders assert that a tied 214-214 vote - rending a defeat - announced by the Speaker Pro Tem was inaccurate and that the motion had in fact passed 215-213 as Republicans changed their votes.
But Democrats dispute that version of events, noting that their own Members were changing votes on the House floor, resulting in the final tally of 212-216.
The dispute prompted the establishment of a select committee to investigate the vote, which is scheduled to hold its first meeting this morning, and produce an interim report Sept. 30.
Republican Rep. Tom Price (Ga.), who has sponsored similar amendments addressing the use of federal funds to assist illegal immigrants, including a measure that failed Tuesday night on a federal housing bill, expressed interest in the Democratic proposal.
"I'd love to be able to talk with them about it and work on it," Price said. He could not say whether such a measure would deter him from offering such amendments in the future without seeing the details of the bill.
"When I talk to folks at home they want to know why we're not including this language on every single piece of legislation," he added.
sertasheep
03-10 11:52 AM
We were able to field questions 101 through 116 in today's conference call.
Questions 117 - 126 will be on the backburner in lieu of new questions received for the next conference call, as some of you may have sought opinion elsewhere. If you would like us to reconsider these questions, please email us again at legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org
Please send new questions to the above email address(legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org), and wait for a question ID to be assigned. You will then receive a confirmation email stating your question has been considered.
We intend to have the next free legal advice conference call in the next couple of weeks (Saturdays)
For those of you that may want to engage Susan Henner for EB-related immigration advice, she can be reached at the following address to schedule appointments for consultation:
75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor
White Plains, New York 10601
Telephone: 914-304-4078
Fax: 914-304-4079
Questions 117 - 126 will be on the backburner in lieu of new questions received for the next conference call, as some of you may have sought opinion elsewhere. If you would like us to reconsider these questions, please email us again at legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org
Please send new questions to the above email address(legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org), and wait for a question ID to be assigned. You will then receive a confirmation email stating your question has been considered.
We intend to have the next free legal advice conference call in the next couple of weeks (Saturdays)
For those of you that may want to engage Susan Henner for EB-related immigration advice, she can be reached at the following address to schedule appointments for consultation:
75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor
White Plains, New York 10601
Telephone: 914-304-4078
Fax: 914-304-4079
Aah_GC
07-19 10:50 PM
I found Sophy Thomas to be an excellent client advocate...
Sophy Thomas, Immigration Attorney: A collection of Immigration Resources that cover Immigrationm law and immigration processes assembled by an immigration lawyer / Attorney (http://www.immigrationattorneys.com/)
She is very good..
Sophy Thomas, Immigration Attorney: A collection of Immigration Resources that cover Immigrationm law and immigration processes assembled by an immigration lawyer / Attorney (http://www.immigrationattorneys.com/)
She is very good..
No comments:
Post a Comment